Save The Starving Children

Save The Starving Children

Yeah, I know -- almost everyone, from left-wing humanists to right-wing Christians, are united in their opinion that feeding the starving children is a vital cause to support. How can anyone be against saving the children? It is a self-evident "good" thing to do, they feel. "Oh, the children (sob, sniffle)." Only "bad" people question it. Well, count me as one of the "bad" people.

What is the effect of saving the starving children? Feeding starving children allows them to grow up and breed even more starving children. People in favor of that -- most people -- are incredibly stupid and shortsighted. They are just perpetuating misery from generation to generation.

Maybe it would be OK to feed the starving children, as long as they were spayed and neutered so that they could not pass along their failed religious and cultural ideologies that led to their starvation to a new generation of starving children. But both the left-wing humanists and right-wing Christians are not about to even suggest that solution, much less insist upon it. The pussy liberal lefties are against it because of being labeled racist and/or genocidal. The a-hole Christian right-wingers are against it because of their stupid (unworkable in real life), anti-life sexual and reproduction religious beliefs.

Why are there starving children? There are several causes, but the unquestioned major cause is overpopulation, which leads to per capital resource problems. In case you didn't know, growing food requires fertile soil. It requires clean, plentiful water. It requires a certain amount of those per person. And, a little extra is needed because of potential weather or problems that might perhaps affect crop yields. You have heard droughts, perhaps? Untimely excess rain? Floods...?

The only solution to "hunger" and other resource problems is population reduction, but most people, including religious and political leaders are not even interested in population stabilization.

Oh, you might say, what about bettering crop yields? You don't like "factory farms" and "chemical pollution", but what are the alternatives? Sorry to break the news, but there isn't enough good land and water to grow organic alfalfa sprouts and free-range chickens for everyone -- at affordable prices. But price, you might say, price is no object if we are to feed everyone. That just shows your total economic ignorance.

Billions of people have been added to the world's population in the twentieth century. In the last couple of decades, or less, the world population has increased from 6 billion to 6.5 billion. Do you know what 6 billion is? Probably not, so here it is: 6,000,000,000. Do you know what the difference between 6 billion and 6.5 billion is? Probably not, as you likely flunked basic arithmetic in your socialized (public) school system. So, here it is: the difference is 500,000,000. How big is that? The United States population is around 300,000,000 (maybe more if all the illegal aliens could be counted). Anyway, that means in the last twenty years or less, more people than in all the U.S. have been added to the world population.

And you want to feed the starving children? Are you fricking idiots?

“Whatever your cause, it is a lost cause without population control.”

No "Green" without Population Control. There's too Much Brown!

There's a lot of blather about ecology and how to become "greener".

Stupid questions such as "Where should the city, county, state, country, world start working toward becoming a "greener" community ... world?" are continually asked. "What environmental issues should be given priority?"

Few are willing address the root cause of environmental problems. Politically incorrect. And those that do are labeled as racist, ungodly, or just anti-humanity.

"Green" is an issue simply because, one, there is too much brown -- that is, too much human waste of all kinds. And, two, too much energy and resource use. And the cause of those problems is simply out-of-control population growth almost everywhere.

Until the issue of out-of-control population growth is addressed by stopping it -- "green"? Fuggedaboudit.

Everyone's brown has to go somewhere. Everyone has to use energy and resources. Even if you reduce the amounts per person, the inexorable population growth means more brown to deal with, and dwindling energy and resources per person.

"Greening" attempts without population REDUCTION are like tilting at windmills. To get "green" will require changing religious attitudes towards birth control, abortion, and infanticide. To get "green" will require changing business and government attitudes about "growth is good" boosterism. To get "green" will require immediate ceasing of subsidizing litters of human spawn, which means ceasing funding for public schools, aid for dependent children, tax breaks for children, and other direct and indirect subsidies for breeding. You get more of anything you support and subsidize, and that especially includes children.

The only way to make a city, state, or country "green" is to make it child UNFRIENDLY. Deal with it!

You don't want to do what is necessary? Fine. Then forget "green". You can't have it both ways. Grow up and deal with it.

Whatever your cause, it's a lost cause without population control.

Self-Replicating Robots Announced on Earth Day 2009

On Earth Day, 2009, scientists announce self-replicating robots. These self-replicating robots have the capability of taking materials from their environments and efficiently incorporating those materials into their structures. In addition to using the environmental materials for their own maintenance, they are even able to use the environmental elements to create even more of themselves.

They are, in fact, so efficient at using environmental materials to increase their numbers that they, in every case, use up all the materials in their environments, at which time they cease to be able to replicate.

This is due to a serious robotic programming "issue", and the scientists have not yet determined a method of programming the robots to exercise what would be called, in human terms, "self-control". They would like the programming to incorporate a feedback loop so that the robots would reduce their rate of replication so that the resources available to them would continue indefinitely. Unfortunately, given the difficulties of programming such an effective "self-control" algorithm, no schedule for completion has yet been announced.

Scientist have given these self-replicating robots several names, depending on the model, including Catholics, Mormons, Southern Baptists, Muslims, Hindus...

How the Human Race Went Extinct 200,000 Years Ago.

About 200,040 years ago, humans came to the conclusion that it was heartless, irresponsible, and politically incorrect to tolerate the following social evils:
1) Allowing the deformed ("differently abled"), sickly ("chemically, allergenic... sensitive") and stupid ("mentally challenged"), to die at birth or shortly thereafter.
2) Allowing those unable or unwilling (by reason of their attitude, health, or age) to hunt or gather, to die.

They decided that all human life was valuable, regardless of circumstances. They decided that all possible resources should be devoted to sustaining the lives of those that had theretofore been allowed to naturally die. This led to increasing time being spent on caring for the increasing population of those unable to care for themselves. Increasing resources were spent on those unable to care for themselves.

Yet, those unable or unwilling to care for themselves also bred, in addition to the able and willing people, increasing the numbers of those unable or unwilling to care for themselves.

So, fewer people were available to gather (increasing numbers having become engaged in "care"), and what was gathered had to be divided amongst more people. Fewer people were available to hunt (increasing numbers having become engaged in "care"), and what was killed in the hunt had to be divided amongst more people.

The people began to starve, and yet they continued breeding a larger but even more unviable population. After all, "growth is good", "compassion is good", "oh, the children, sob, sniffle", "everyone deserves food, fur, and pharmaceuticals". After two generations (forty years), the human race then went extinct 200,000 years ago.

California Brush Fires Destruction - The Reasons Why

California Brush Fires Destruction - The Reasons Why

There are several reasons why every year in western states such as California, and Southern California, in particular, there are devastating brush fires.

One reason, in case you haven't noticed, most of the areas are dry. There is little rain. The vegetation that does grow naturally, burns easily and rapidly.

Next, government policies are to put out all small fires as soon as possible. That leads to an accumulation of unburned vegetation, which creates a setting for HUGE future fires.

The reason for putting out small fires is that people have built in the dry areas, and they don't want their stuff burned out.

Now, ask yourself, why do people build in dangerous areas? One reason is stupidity. Another reason is, "everybody has to live somewhere".

The ROOT reason is accelerating overpopulation. New population has no place to go except for more dangerous and undesirable locations. Is that so fricking hard to understand? Thanks to generations of uncontrolled breeding -- that is, thanks to people dropping litters of spawn with no more forethought than cats, rats, and dogs -- we have a catastrophic overpopulation problem.

As long as population keeps increasing, and is not REDUCED, the problems of fires in particular, and of the environment, energy, ocean fishery depletion... will continue to WORSEN.

Note to religious wackos - Catholics, fundamentalist Christians, Mormons, Muslims... "If you are against birth control and ABORTION, you are a f-ing idiot -- LITERALLY!"

Note to lefty loonies, environmentalists... "Whatever your cause, it is a LOST CAUSE without population control."

Oil Wars in the Mid-East (Iran, Iraq) - the Reason is Out-of-Control Population Growth

Why the Wars for Oil in the Mid-East cesspools of Iraq and Iran (coming soon)? The reason is out-of-control overpopulation growth.

If people worldwide had not -- and were still not -- breeding like effing cats, rats and dogs with no thought of consequence, there would not have been a "need" to go to those cesspool Arab lands filled with humans even stupider than those in the U.S., Europe, Asia, India, and South- and Central-America, in search of oil.

If not for a population far in excess of sustainable carrying capacity, the effing Arab wogs would have remained impoverished, backwater, irrelevant, if it were not for their oil. So, all the breeders have caused a hornet's nest, empowered by oil money, to be loosed upon the world.

And "our" governments don't mind -- Bush, Cheney, Clinton, Gore -- THEIR asses are safe, and they have a great "excuse" to increase control over the sheeple, and me as collateral damage.

Eff'em all -- the power-sucking governments -- politicians and bureaucrats. Eff'em all -- the slave religions and their sheep -- the Christians, Jews, Muslims.

Brainwashed by the Establishment Media

They keep pounding at us with incessant politically correct views and terminology. They even got to me. Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom (a free mind).

Yesterday, I posted about the water shortage in California:
California Water Shortage - Not My Problem

There is no water shortage. There are just too many people wanting the existing water. The problem is not too little water; it is too many people -- overpopulation.

In any event, I actually wrote "illegal immigrants" in one sentence. Sheesh. It is "illegal aliens", not "illegal immigrants", not "undocumented workers" or whatever the politically correct term du jour happens to be.

It's "illegal aliens", "illegal aliens", "illegal aliens", "illegal aliens", "illegal aliens", "illegal aliens", "illegal aliens"....

California Water Shortage - Not My Problem

There is a water shortage in California, especially Southern California. Duh! It's a fricking DESERT, you know. And, there are TOO MANY PEOPLE.

TOO MANY PEOPLE. Hordes of illegal immigrants illegal aliens. Idiots of all races dropping litters of spawn like there is no tomorrow, with no more thought of consequences than cats, rats, and dogs.

It's time to start spaying and neutering these animals in human skins, and the politicians and bureaucrats pandering to them.

I have not contributed to the population explosion, so I am not going to go out of my way to conserve water, save energy, recycle, preserve endangered species, whatever, unless the pigs put a gun to my head or I cannot financially maintain my lifestyle. Let the fricking religious wackos opposed to abortion and birth control pay the price of overpopulation. Let the liberal lefty-loonies so interested in "saving the children" and "la raza" pay the price of overpopulation. As far as I'm concerned, they can all just go pound sand. 'f 'em all.

Border Fences - Saudi Arabia-Iraq, US-Mexico

A friend sent a link to a story about how Saudi Arabia is building a fence along their border to keep Iraqis out. He wondered why "we" can't do the same to keep the Mexicans out. My answer is:

"We" could do it. But the New World Order puppet-masters don't WANT it. The object of open borders is to create a strife-torn, middle-class-eliminated plantation. Along with merger with Canada and Mexico, to bring down the U.S. and Canada to Mexican levels. North-American Union with a common currency, the "Amero".

You will note that the leaders/rulers in even the most impoverished countries do not suffer lack of food, luxury cars, mansions, toys, servants, and other perquisites. There is no NEED for a prosperous middle class in ANY country.

I do not blame our rulers. I and they see that prosperity for all will ruin the planet even faster. And since, due to right-wing religious wacko fascists and left-wing kumbaya bleeding hearts, there will never be effective population control (unless they can finally engineer genetic plagues), they have to reduce resource use by reducing consumption. And, it may even be too late, as it is, for them.

Finally, I don't give a crap. As you know, I am old. I was lucky to be born in the U.S., but it is living on past glory. Americans are no better or more deserving or special than those in any other country. 95% of Americans are just as stupid, irrational, ignorant, and venal as those in any other country.

Only the details of stupidity and irrationality differ. (Both Islam and Christianity, for example, are slave religions.) It is not from lack of desire that there are no more Christian Crusades and Inquisitions; it's just that you could say that maybe Christians have mellowed a bit, or maybe just become pussified. (Which, for me, living here rather than in wog-land, is a good thing -- but the basic irrationality is the same.)

In any event, the probably genetic disposition to make the wrong en-mass choices, including breeding like f'ing cats, rats, and dogs, without control or thought of consequences, will lead to inevitable collapse. Hard to say under which type of political or religious regime it will happen faster.

F'em all.

Daylight Savings Time - Politically Correct Crap

Who gives a crap about Daylight Savings Time? It is a pain in the ass. But, it's "for the children" (sob, sniffle, snuffle) and/or politically correct "ecological" reasons. (I didn't contribute to the population explosion -- let all the f'ing breeders pay for the problems they have caused, not me).

BTW, I just have my computer clock set to to ZULU (Greenwich time WITHOUT DST adjustments) all year long. Screw it.

But it still takes me a half hour spring and fall to diddle all the other clocks and watches. F'em all.

Public Education -- Subsidizing the Spawn of the Irresponsible

Education is NOT the responsibility of a state, a local schoolboard, or a Hillary's village.
It is the PARENTS' responsibility.

It's not up to us who have elected to not contribute to the population explosion to subsidize the spawn of biological clock ticking bimbos and macho men.

Subsidizing dropping of litters of rugrats leads to more overpopulation, more resource depletion, more pollution, more crime, and -- more wars over resources, whether on a world level over oil, or on a local level over parking, housing, beach access, etc.

DON'T BREED 'EM IF YOU CAN'T FEED 'EM -- OR CAN'T EDUCATE THEM -- YOURSELF.